Blockchain technology has revolutionized various industries by providing decentralized and secure systems for transactions. However, as blockchain networks grow, they face a significant challenge: scalability. The ability to handle an increasing number of transactions without compromising performance is crucial for widespread adoption.
The Blockchain Trilemma: Security, Decentralization, and Scalability
The blockchain trilemma refers to the challenge of achieving three critical aspects of blockchain technology simultaneously: security, scalability, and decentralization. This concept was first introduced by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin.
- Security: Ensures the integrity and safety of data, making it difficult for malicious entities to alter or manipulate information.
- Decentralization: Distributes control among multiple participants, reducing the risk of a single point of failure.
- Scalability: The ability to handle an increasing number of transactions and data without compromising performance.
Achieving all three simultaneously has been a significant hurdle for blockchain networks. While efforts like Ethereum 2.0 aim to improve scalability, challenges persist.
What Are Rollups and Why Are They Important?
Rollups are Layer 2 scaling solutions designed to improve the scalability of blockchain networks. They work by processing transactions off-chain and then settling them on-chain, reducing congestion and improving throughput.
There are two main types of rollups:
- Optimistic Rollups: Assume transactions are valid and only perform computations if a fraud proof is provided.
- ZK-Rollups: Use zero-knowledge proofs to validate transactions, ensuring correctness without revealing underlying data.
While both solutions aim to enhance scalability, they come with their own sets of trade-offs in terms of complexity, latency, and compatibility.
Introducing Based Rollups: A Game-Changer for Blockchain Performance
Based Rollups, also known as L1-sequenced rollups, represent a novel approach to scaling blockchain networks. Proposed by Ethereum researcher Justin Drake in March 2023, based rollups leverage the existing infrastructure of Layer 1 blockchains to manage transaction sequencing.
How Based Rollups Work
Unlike traditional rollups that rely on their own sequencers, based rollups utilize the base layer’s validators, proposers, and searchers to handle transaction sequencing. This integration allows for greater decentralization and efficiency.
Key Components of Based Rollups
- Execution Layer: Handles transaction execution off-chain.
- Data Availability Layer: Ensures that transaction data is accessible and verifiable.
- Sequencing Layer: Utilizes Layer 1 validators to sequence transactions.
- Settlement Layer: Finalizes transactions on the base layer.
This architecture enables based rollups to offer improved scalability and performance compared to traditional rollup models.
Benefits of Based Rollups
- Enhanced Decentralization: By leveraging Layer 1 infrastructure, based rollups reduce reliance on centralized sequencers.
- Improved Security: Utilizing the base layer’s security mechanisms ensures robust protection against attacks.
- Cost Efficiency: Reducing the need for separate sequencers lowers operational costs.
- Simplified Architecture: The integration with Layer 1 simplifies the overall system design.
The Basics of Based Rollups
Defining Based Rollups: A New Breed of Blockchain Solutions
At its core, Based Rollups are an exciting and innovative approach to blockchain scalability. They sit on top of a blockchain’s base layer think of them as a “layer-2” solution designed to improve the overall speed, transaction throughput, and cost-efficiency of the network without sacrificing security. But here’s the catch: unlike traditional rollups, Based Rollups don’t rely on their own set of sequencers or validators. Instead, they tap into the Layer 1 blockchain’s infrastructure for transaction sequencing. This makes them uniquely different and potentially more decentralized than other rollups in the market.
In simple terms, while rollups are designed to handle transactions off-chain (to reduce congestion), Based Rollups use the security and structure of the base layer to ensure these transactions are securely validated and settled on the main blockchain. It’s almost like outsourcing the heavy lifting of transaction ordering to the base layer while maintaining all the benefits of speed and scalability.
How Do Based Rollups Differ from Traditional Rollups?
Now, you might be wondering, how do Based Rollups stack up against their well-known cousins: zk-rollups and optimistic rollups?
Here’s a quick comparison:
- Optimistic Rollups: These assume transactions are valid unless proven otherwise. This system leads to faster processing, but if fraud occurs, there’s a delay while fraud proofs are processed. It’s like assuming the best and only checking the facts if someone raises a red flag.
- zk-Rollups: Zero-Knowledge rollups use cryptographic proofs to verify the accuracy of transactions, ensuring high security. They’re more computationally expensive and complex but provide faster finality since the proof is essentially a guarantee.
- Based Rollups: The standout feature of Based Rollups is that they leverage Layer 1’s validators, allowing them to be more decentralized and efficient. By using existing infrastructure, they offer better transaction throughput without needing to deploy complex cryptographic proofs or relying on the assumption that transactions are valid.
The fundamental difference lies in how transactions are validated and sequenced. Based Rollups avoid the risk of centralization (which can occur with some Optimistic Rollups) while reducing the computational complexity seen in zk-rollups.
Core Components of Based Rollups
Let’s take a deeper dive into the structure that makes Based Rollups work. Here’s how each component contributes to improved scalability:
1. Execution Layer
The Execution Layer handles the computation and state transitions of transactions. This is the layer where the magic happens transactions are processed off-chain before they’re sent to the main chain for final settlement. By offloading these operations, Based Rollups can significantly increase throughput and reduce the load on the Layer 1 blockchain. It’s like offloading busy work to a dedicated team while you focus on the bigger picture.
2. Data Availability Layer
The Data Availability Layer ensures that all the data associated with transactions is available and accessible. Since the transactions are processed off-chain in the Execution Layer, there needs to be a reliable mechanism to retrieve this data when needed. The data must be available for verification by the base layer and rollup validators. Think of this like ensuring all documents are stored in a centralized database, making it easy for anyone to retrieve them as required.
3. Consensus and Settlement on Layer 1
One of the most powerful features of Based Rollups is their reliance on Layer 1 for consensus and settlement. The transaction history is ultimately stored on the base chain, which means the network’s security and integrity are maintained. When a transaction is confirmed, it’s finalized on the Layer 1 blockchain. This eliminates the risk of having a separate layer that might be vulnerable to attacks, ensuring that the entire system remains highly secure.
4. Rollup Sequencers
Rollup Sequencers are the components responsible for ordering and processing transactions. They ensure that transactions are processed in a sequence, preventing any potential conflicts or double-spending. However, with Based Rollups, these sequencers aren’t separate from the base chain but are part of the existing infrastructure. By using Layer 1 validators for sequencing, Based Rollups reduce the chance of centralization and make the entire process more efficient. Think of sequencers as traffic controllers who ensure every car (transaction) moves in an orderly fashion.
How Based Rollups Work: Simplifying Blockchain Transactions
Understanding Transaction Flow in Based Rollups
One of the most exciting aspects of Based Rollups is how they streamline the entire transaction process. Let’s break it down step by step:
- User Transaction Initiation: A user initiates a transaction (let’s say, sending tokens or interacting with a decentralized application). Instead of going through the lengthy process of validation and consensus on the base blockchain right away, this transaction is processed off-chain in the Execution Layer of the Based Rollup.
- Transaction Execution Off-Chain: The rollup executes the transaction by updating the state, ensuring the transaction is valid according to the protocol’s rules. This step is much faster because the execution is happening off-chain, reducing the time it takes to confirm the transaction.
- Transaction Bundling and Sequencing: Once transactions are executed off-chain, they are grouped into bundles or “blocks” by the rollup. These bundles are then sent to the base blockchain for finalization. The sequencers (in this case, validators from the base layer) organize these transactions in a proper order, ensuring there are no conflicts or double-spending.
- Settlement on Layer 1: After sequencing, the final bundled transactions are pushed to the base blockchain (Layer 1), where they are permanently recorded. This step ensures that the transaction is secure, auditable, and tamper-proof, as it inherits the base chain’s full security.
- Minimal Trust Assumptions: Unlike traditional systems where the entire transaction process is managed within a closed system, Based Rollups rely on the inherent trust of the Layer 1 blockchain. This reduces the number of assumptions about the system’s integrity, as users are primarily trusting the base blockchain’s security mechanisms. It’s like trusting the safety of a high-security vault to store your datano need to verify each lock when the vault itself is bulletproof.
Sequencing and Data Availability
When it comes to blockchain transactions, sequencing and data availability are two essential elements that impact performance and security. In Based Rollups, these are handled in an innovative and efficient way.
- Sequencing Transactions: Traditional Layer 2 solutions often rely on their own sequencers to order transactions, but this introduces potential points of centralization. In Based Rollups, however, sequencing is done using the Layer 1 blockchain’s validators, making the process more secure and less reliant on any single entity. This means that there’s a much lower chance of malicious actors attempting to manipulate transaction order, and the system remains more decentralized and trustworthy.
- Data Availability: In the world of blockchain, data availability refers to the ability to ensure that the data associated with a transaction is accessible and verifiable. Based Rollups make sure that the data involved in transactions is publicly available and easy to access when needed for validation. By tying data availability to the base blockchain’s security layer, Based Rollups avoid the risk of data being lost or unavailable, which can occur in some Layer 2 solutions that rely on third-party providers.
By simplifying sequencing and data availability, Based Rollups lower the overall cost of operation while maintaining the integrity and security of the entire system. This ensures that every user’s transaction is not only fast but also backed by the robustness of the base blockchain.
Transaction Speed and Finality: What Makes Based Rollups Fast?
When it comes to blockchain networks, speed and finality are crucial for user experience and adoption. So, what makes Based Rollups stand out?
- Faster Transactions: Based Rollups are designed to process transactions off-chain before they are recorded on the main blockchain. This significantly cuts down the time spent on each transaction. Unlike traditional on-chain transactions, which require validators to confirm each one individually, Based Rollups execute the majority of the process off-chain and only send the results to the base layer for finalization. This reduces bottlenecks and ensures quicker transaction throughput.
- Reduced Latency and Costs: Because Based Rollups use Layer 1 for settlement but handle the bulk of computation off-chain, they reduce the need for expensive and time-consuming on-chain validation. This also means that gas fees can be dramatically lower than traditional blockchain transactions, providing cost-effective scalability for users.
- Quick Finality: One of the most significant advantages of Based Rollups is that once transactions are settled on the Layer 1 blockchain, they are finalized immediately. The transaction is confirmed in a secure, immutable ledger without waiting for additional layers of validation. This contrasts with Optimistic Rollups, which require a delay period to account for fraud proofs. With Based Rollups, users don’t have to wait around for the transaction to be finalized, improving the overall speed of the blockchain.
- Better Than Other Layer 2 Solutions: Compared to traditional Layer 2 solutions, Based Rollups provide both faster transactions and quicker finality. Traditional rollups, like zk-rollups, offer fast finality but can struggle with higher computational costs. Optimistic Rollups, on the other hand, may have lower transaction fees but introduce delays due to the need for fraud proofs. Based Rollups strike the balance, delivering high throughput, low fees, and faster finality without compromising security.
Ready to scale your blockchain with Based Rollups?
The Performance Benefits of Based Rollups
Scalability Without Sacrificing Decentralization
One of the biggest challenges facing blockchain technology today is achieving scalability without compromising decentralization and that’s where Based Rollups really shine.
Traditional Layer 2 solutions often struggle with this balance. They promise to increase throughput and speed by processing transactions off-chain, but in doing so, they sometimes rely on centralized systems for transaction sequencing and validation. This reliance can create a single point of failure and reduce the system’s overall decentralization.
Based Rollups avoid this pitfall by leveraging the existing infrastructure of Layer 1 blockchains, like Ethereum. By using Layer 1’s validators for transaction sequencing, Based Rollups ensure that the decentralized nature of the blockchain is maintained. This is akin to having the entire network of validators ensuring transaction validity without putting the responsibility on a single entity or centralized group.
- Improved Decentralization: Since Based Rollups don’t require separate sequencers or validators, they maintain the same level of decentralization as the base layer. This means that no single party has the power to manipulate transaction ordering, and the security and trust in the system are enhanced.
- Scalability with Security: With transactions processed off-chain and only settled on the base layer, Based Rollups offer unparalleled scalability without sacrificing security or decentralization. They provide the best of both worlds: increased throughput and secure, decentralized validation.
Lower Costs for Users and Operators
In blockchain networks, transaction costs are a critical consideration for both developers and users. Traditional Layer 2 solutions often involve high infrastructure and maintenance costs, especially when they need to build custom sequencers or rely on complex systems. Based Rollups, however, offer a simpler and more cost-effective approach.
- Simplified Architecture: Unlike other rollups that need separate sequencers, Based Rollups rely on the base chain’s existing infrastructure for sequencing. This eliminates the need for additional infrastructure and reduces the overall complexity of maintaining the system.
- Reduced Gas Fees: Since most of the transaction processing happens off-chain, the gas fees required for each transaction are significantly reduced. By leveraging Layer 1 for settlement, Based Rollups offer lower operational costs for both users and developers.
- Efficiency in Transaction Processing: With transactions executed off-chain and only the final result settled on-chain, Based Rollups reduce congestion on the base blockchain. This means faster transactions and lower fees, making them more attractive for both developers looking to build scalable applications and users seeking efficient transaction processing.
This cost efficiency makes Based Rollups a highly attractive solution for applications ranging from DeFi to NFT marketplaces. Developers can integrate Based Rollups into their systems without worrying about escalating costs, while users enjoy faster and cheaper transactions compared to other Layer 2 solutions.
Security Enhancements Through Layer 1 Integration
When it comes to blockchain, security is always a top priority. One of the standout features of Based Rollups is that they inherit the robust security of the base blockchain, such as Ethereum, by utilizing its validators for sequencing and finality.
- Layer 1 Security Benefits: By tying transaction sequencing and settlement to the base blockchain’s security layer, Based Rollups provide a level of protection that many other Layer 2 solutions can’t match. Since the transactions are ultimately finalized on the base chain, they benefit from the same level of cryptographic security and immutability that Ethereum, for example, provides.
- Trust and Stability: Unlike solutions that rely on proprietary mechanisms or third-party validators for transaction validation, Based Rollups reduce trust assumptions. The security protocols of Layer 1 ensure that the transactions processed in the rollup are secure, transparent, and verifiable, even when they’re executed off-chain.
- Reduced Attack Surface: Because the rollup’s validation and settlement are tied directly to Layer 1, Based Rollups have a smaller attack surface compared to other systems. The decentralized and secure infrastructure of the base blockchain adds an extra layer of protection, ensuring that malicious actors can’t easily exploit vulnerabilities within the Layer 2 system.
- Enhanced Fraud Prevention: Layer 1’s consensus mechanism further protects Based Rollups from fraud and malicious activity. Since fraud detection and transaction validation are handled by the underlying blockchain’s network of validators, fraud prevention is more reliable than in rollups with independent or centralized sequencers.
Use Cases for Based Rollups: Revolutionizing Industries
Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Scaling Without Compromising Security
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has become a cornerstone of the blockchain space, offering innovative financial services without relying on traditional financial intermediaries. However, as DeFi platforms grow, they face significant scalability challenges, especially during high transaction volume periods. This is where Based Rollups come into play, providing a robust solution for scaling without sacrificing security.
- Faster Transactions: Based Rollups dramatically increase transaction throughput by processing the majority of transactions off-chain. This reduces network congestion, ensuring that users can execute trades, transfers, and other financial operations much faster than with traditional blockchain solutions.
- Lower Gas Fees: One of the biggest pain points for DeFi users has been the rising gas fees, especially during times of network congestion. By offloading the transaction execution to the rollup layer, Based Rollups significantly reduce the costs associated with transaction validation, making DeFi applications more affordable for everyday users.
- Enhanced Security: DeFi platforms require a high level of trust and security, particularly when handling financial transactions. Based Rollups maintain the security of the base blockchain by using Layer 1 for finality and validation, ensuring that all DeFi transactions are as secure as those executed directly on the main chain.
- Example in Action: Many DeFi applications like lending protocols, decentralized exchanges (DEXs), and automated market makers (AMMs) can benefit from the scalability of Based Rollups. With faster transaction processing and lower fees, these platforms can scale their operations without compromising the core principles of decentralization and security.
NFT Marketplaces: Enabling Smooth and Scalable Experiences
The NFT marketplace has exploded in popularity over the past few years, with millions of users buying, selling, and trading digital assets. However, as the market continues to expand, platforms face performance bottlenecks and high transaction fees particularly when minting and transferring NFTs. Here’s where Based Rollups can revolutionize the NFT space:
- Reducing Congestion: NFT transactions, including minting, listing, and transferring, can quickly create congestion on the blockchain, especially during high demand. Based Rollups help reduce this congestion by processing most transactions off-chain, only submitting the results to the Layer 1 blockchain for final settlement. This ensures that the marketplace remains fast, even as traffic increases.
- Faster and More Affordable Minting: Minting an NFT involves creating a unique digital asset and recording it on the blockchain. This process can be expensive and slow on congested networks. With Based Rollups, the minting process is faster and far less costly, making it easier for artists and creators to produce and sell their work without being burdened by high fees.
- Improved Trading and Transfers: Once NFTs are minted, they are often traded between users. The scalability of Based Rollups ensures that these transactions occur quickly and efficiently, without delays. As a result, NFT owners can enjoy faster transfers and lower fees when trading or selling their assets.
- Example in Action: Consider an NFT marketplace that processes thousands of trades per second. Without an efficient scaling solution, the platform would quickly face delays and high transaction costs. Based Rollups help the marketplace scale to meet the growing demand without sacrificing performance or security.
By offering faster, cheaper, and more scalable solutions, Based Rollups empower NFT marketplaces to deliver a seamless experience for both creators and collectors, creating a smoother and more sustainable ecosystem.
Supply Chain Management and Enterprise Blockchain
Supply chain management is a critical part of many industries, from manufacturing to retail, and managing it on a blockchain can bring immense benefits in terms of transparency, traceability, and efficiency. However, traditional blockchain solutions can struggle with scalability when handling large-scale data from multiple suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors. Based Rollups offer a solution that enables businesses to process transactions at scale while maintaining the integrity of the data.
- Efficient Transaction Processing: In supply chain management, transactions like inventory tracking, shipment status updates, and supplier payments need to be recorded in real-time. Based Rollups handle these transactions off-chain and only submit final results to the main blockchain, dramatically increasing transaction speed and reducing processing time.
- Cost Reduction: Businesses operating large-scale supply chains are often bogged down by high transaction fees and the need for complex infrastructure to process the volume of data. By utilizing Based Rollups, enterprises can simplify their blockchain architecture, cutting costs while maintaining a secure and decentralized system for tracking goods and assets.
- Improved Transparency: Supply chain processes are often fragmented, with each party keeping its own records. With Based Rollups, the integrity of data is assured, and all participants in the supply chain can access a single, immutable ledger of transactions. This ensures that each step in the supply chain from raw materials to finished products is transparent and verifiable.
- Example in Action: Consider a global manufacturing company that sources materials from different regions. Each shipment is tracked through multiple stages of production and transportation. By using Based Rollups, the company can efficiently manage the vast amount of data generated throughout the supply chain while ensuring all parties have access to real-time, verifiable information.
Comparing Based Rollups with Other Blockchain Solutions
Based Rollups vs. zk-Rollups: Which is Faster, Safer, and More Scalable?
zk-Rollups and Based Rollups both fall under the umbrella of Layer 2 solutions designed to improve blockchain scalability, but they achieve this in different ways. Let’s explore how these two technologies stack up against each other in terms of speed, security, scalability, and complexity.
1. Speed
- Based Rollups are designed for speed by executing most transactions off-chain, allowing them to process a higher volume of transactions with lower latency. The only time spent on-chain is when the transaction results are settled, which is a much more efficient way to manage data.
- zk-Rollups, on the other hand, rely on zero-knowledge proofs to validate transactions. While zero-knowledge proofs are incredibly secure, the process of generating these proofs can be computationally intensive, which can slow things down when compared to Based Rollups. However, zk-Rollups are still faster than many traditional blockchain processes due to the efficiency of their proofs.
2. Security
- Both zk-Rollups and Based Rollups inherit the security of their underlying Layer 1 blockchains. This means that both benefit from the robust security features provided by popular networks like Ethereum.
- zk-Rollups use mathematically sound proofs (zero-knowledge proofs), which make them inherently resistant to fraud. They provide strong security guarantees because the proofs ensure the correctness of transactions without revealing any underlying data.
- Based Rollups utilize Layer 1 validators to sequence transactions. This means that security is maintained by leveraging the already established security mechanisms of the base blockchain, offering trusted finality with every transaction. This reduces the risk of malicious activity compared to other rollup solutions that might rely on external validators.
3. Scalability
- Based Rollups excel at scalability due to their efficient use of off-chain transaction processing and minimal on-chain settlement. They significantly reduce the congestion often seen on Layer 1, leading to faster transaction processing with lower fees.
- zk-Rollups also offer impressive scalability by reducing the amount of data that needs to be processed on-chain, making them ideal for applications that need both scalability and security. However, they can face some challenges when scaling to extremely high transaction volumes due to the complexity of generating proofs.
4. Complexity
- zk-Rollups are technically complex because they rely on sophisticated cryptographic techniques such as zero-knowledge proofs. This adds complexity both for developers to implement and for the system to maintain.
- Based Rollups, while offering strong performance, are less complex in comparison because they don’t require the heavy computational resources needed for zero-knowledge proofs. Instead, they rely on Layer 1’s existing infrastructure, making them easier to implement and manage in the long run.
Based Rollups vs. Optimistic Rollups: Trade-offs in Performance and Finality
When comparing Based Rollups to Optimistic Rollups, we find both similarities and differences that influence performance and user experience. Let’s take a closer look at the trade-offs:
1. Finality Time
- Optimistic Rollups assume transactions are valid unless a challenge is made. This means that finality can take some time, typically around 7 days, to allow for the fraud-proof period. If no fraud claims are made, transactions are finalized after this time. This delay introduces latency and can be frustrating for users who expect immediate finality.
- Based Rollups, on the other hand, offer instant finality once a transaction is settled on the base blockchain. The reliance on Layer 1 for settlement ensures that once a transaction is processed, it is immediately finalized and secure. This instant finality improves the user experience, especially in high-velocity applications like DeFi or NFT marketplaces, where speed matters.
2. User Experience
- Optimistic Rollups offer a smoother experience in the short term, since they don’t require complex validation proofs upfront. However, the challenge period for fraud proofs means users may face delays in transaction finality, which could impact user trust and satisfaction.
- Based Rollups, by utilizing Layer 1’s infrastructure, allow for faster processing and reduced transaction latency, offering an overall better user experience. Since transactions are secured and settled immediately on the base blockchain, users enjoy faster confirmation times.
3. Application Suitability
- Optimistic Rollups are well-suited for applications where speed is less critical and finality time can be tolerated, such as in long-term financial contracts or non-time-sensitive transactions. They are cost-effective for applications that don’t require instant settlement.
- Based Rollups, however, are ideal for real-time applications, such as DeFi platforms and NFT marketplaces, where speed and instant finality are crucial. Since Based Rollups allow for instant finality and fast transaction speeds, they are more suited to applications that require quick execution and low transaction costs.
When Should You Choose Based Rollups Over Other Layer 2 Solutions?
Choosing the right Layer 2 solution is crucial for the success of your blockchain project. Based Rollups might be the right choice for your application if you prioritize speed, low costs, and security while maintaining decentralization. Here are some practical insights into when Based Rollups should be your go-to solution:
1. Scalability Needs
- If your blockchain application is growing quickly and facing congestion on Layer 1, Based Rollups are a great solution. Their ability to process transactions off-chain while leveraging Layer 1 for final settlement makes them highly scalable, even during peak demand times.
2. Cost Reduction
- If gas fees are a major concern for your users or business, Based Rollups can significantly reduce transaction costs by offloading computation to the Layer 2 network. This makes it an ideal choice for DeFi platforms or NFT marketplaces where transaction fees can quickly add up.
3. Need for Fast Finality
- When your application requires instant finality, particularly in real-time applications such as gaming or high-frequency trading, Based Rollups are the right choice. With immediate transaction settlement on the base blockchain, they outperform other Layer 2 solutions like Optimistic Rollups, which suffer from delays in finality.
4. Security Considerations
- If security is paramount, Based Rollups provide the added benefit of using Layer 1 security mechanisms, ensuring that your transactions are as safe as those processed directly on the main chain. This makes them ideal for financial services and enterprise solutions that require a high level of security.
5. Simplicity and Developer Friendliness
- If you want a simpler solution with less complexity for developers, Based Rollups are easier to implement than zk-Rollups. Their integration with Layer 1 infrastructure reduces the technical challenges associated with more complex systems.
Conclusion
Based Rollups represent a powerful solution to the scalability challenges faced by blockchain networks today. By combining the best aspects of Layer 1 security, faster transaction processing, and lower operational costs, they provide a seamless and scalable option for a variety of applications, from DeFi platforms to NFT marketplaces and enterprise solutions. With their ability to deliver instant finality and significantly reduce transaction fees, Based Rollups are setting the stage for a new era of efficient, decentralized blockchain networks. If you’re looking to leverage the power of Based Rollups for your project, Blockchain App Factory provides expert Based Rollups development services, helping you build scalable, secure, and cost-effective blockchain solutions tailored to your needs.
